Bob Sanders Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 My main and major focus is on the planche right now. I want to go for the straddle planche. But I find I have not the strengtth yet to do so. So I wanted to work more on the planche thru the weeks. SO will training 2 to 3 times a week on the planche static hold help me progress faster or will once a week is better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blairbob Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Yes, 2-3x a week is definitely doable and will help you more than 1x a week.So long as it doesn't burn you out. Depends on what you are doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike.m Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 I've heard that training static holds for more than a month screws up the central nervous system. Is that true and If it is why ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blairbob Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 Interesting comment but it lacks the data of how often and how much per day and week. I imagine that it could be with the right variables just like any overtraining as FSP can hit the CNS pretty hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach Sommer Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 I've heard that training static holds for more than a month screws up the central nervous system. Is that true and If it is why ?No, this has no basis in fact; otherwise competitive gymnasts would all possess totally disfunctional central nervous systems.Yours in Fitness,Coach Sommer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike.m Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 I've heard that training static holds for more than a month screws up the central nervous system. Is that true and If it is why ?No, this has no basis in fact; otherwise competitive gymnasts would all possess totally disfunctional central nervous systems.Yours in Fitness,Coach SommerI generally hear this from MMa guys so maybe it only applies to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blairbob Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 Gymnasts should be highly adapted to static holds while more than likely most MMA guys are not. Thus it's more taxing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach Sommer Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 Gymnasts should be highly adapted to static holds while more than likely most MMA guys are not. Thus it's more taxing.It sounds as though they are engaging in "straining, rather than training"; and failing to allow their bodies sufficient time to adapt by improperly programming their static hold work.Yours in Fitness,Coach Sommer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razz Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 It's all individual and you have to feel your body's reaction and learn what's best for you that's the only answer. If you burn out and lose strength you need to work less, if you improve faster you are probably doing it right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longshanks Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Gymnasts should be highly adapted to static holds while more than likely most MMA guys are not. Thus it's more taxing.It sounds as though they are engaging in "straining, rather than training"; and failing to allow their bodies sufficient time to adapt by improperly programming their static hold work.Yours in Fitness,Coach SommerYea I'll be the first to admit it's easy to get carried away and not realise you are doing too much. I think it seems to be a universal stigma in fighting disciplines that you have to train till you can't move any more.. then train some more. This obviously doesn't apply to strength training. When I first started my first cycle I didn't quite twig onto to 50% of max hold time principal and ended up doing them for too long and actually lost strength in that first cycle. Less really is more in this case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now