Cristian.Sirius Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 I have never seen anyone getting directly into an iron cross from hanging in a competition. How difficult is this? the movement is in this video, provided by the link below, at 6:26 http://youtu.be/zgNp9veldcY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karri Kytömaa Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 There you have a real butterfly to cross and not some odd kip action. I'm pretty sure someone has done that in a competition too. Cool video anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piotr Ochocki Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 Look for Balandin and his "patented" skills Balandin 1 (from hang to maltese) and Balandin 2 from hang to inverted cross, he does your butterfly (hang to cross) plus extra. https://www.gymnasticbodies.com/forum/topic/7966-iron-cross-from-the-bottom-position/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cristian.Sirius Posted May 23, 2013 Author Share Posted May 23, 2013 I have no idea it was called "butterfly" Thx anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joshua Slocum Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 I have never seen anyone getting directly into an iron cross from hanging in a competition. How difficult is this? the movement is in this video, provided by the link below, at 6:26 That's a muscle-up to cross. It's rarely done in competition because it's not worth more than a regular cross. If done with perfectly straight arms, it's called a 'butterfly'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keilani Gutierrez Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 That's a muscle-up to cross. It's rarely done in competition because it's not worth more than a regular cross. If done with perfectly straight arms, it's called a 'butterfly'.that's pretty lame if it isn't worth more than a regular cross. there must definitely be a not-so-obvious reason for this being like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joshua Slocum Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 that's pretty lame if it isn't worth more than a regular cross. there must definitely be a not-so-obvious reason for this being like that. Perhaps the fact that it's not much more difficult than a cross? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keilani Gutierrez Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 -shrugg- i'm not at the stage to know yet, so i don't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Douglas Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 That's a muscle-up to cross. It's rarely done in competition because it's not worth more than a regular cross. This is about the only thing I don't like about watching high-level gymnastic competition Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timothy Aiken Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 Butterfly to inverted cross too! Looks intense! But hey, I wouldn't know It's at 3:30 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blairbob Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 well, Muscle-Up used to be an A value skill. Now, it's not even an "A". Technically you could give it a non group A but Muscle-Up to Cross isn't in the code (though MU to BL still is I think). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timothy Aiken Posted June 10, 2013 Share Posted June 10, 2013 Giving a muscle up a point value on rings, would be like giving running a value on floor. It's like that for two reasons: 1. Running and the muscle up are just what you do in order to do the most skills! 2. Relative to everything else, they aren't difficult enough to warrant a point value. I am not a gymnast, but this is what I have gathered through my experiences on this forum, talking to numerous gymnastics coaches, and personal experience. P.S - This is off topic, but what is the correct term: gymnastic coach, or gymnastics coach? My understanding is that gymnastics is a noun, and gymnastic is an adjective. Is this correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joshua Slocum Posted June 10, 2013 Share Posted June 10, 2013 Giving a muscle up a point value on rings, would be like giving running a value on floor. It's like that for two reasons: 1. Running and the muscle up are just what you do in order to do the most skills! 2. Relative to everything else, they aren't difficult enough to warrant a point value. I am not a gymnast, but this is what I have gathered through my experiences on this forum, talking to numerous gymnastics coaches, and personal experience. P.S - This is off topic, but what is the correct term: gymnastic coach, or gymnastics coach? My understanding is that gymnastics is a noun, and gymnastic is an adjective. Is this correct? I'm actually not 100% sure why the muscle up has no point value on the rings. The forwards roll with bent body has an "A" value, and it's pretty much the same difficulty. Similarly, the back and front handsprings are "A"-valued on floor, and the same reasoning could be used to argue that they shouldn't be counted. Gymnastics coach is the preferred term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now