Hi,
I just started the Foundation One course about a week ago and I am enjoying the exercises so far.
It is a very different approach to training than what I am accustomed to. I have come from a calisthenics based background, working on dips, pull-ups, push up progressions. The mentality among a lot of calisthenic trainers is that is you want to improve your strength then it is best to do sets in the 1-5 rep range. If you want hypertrophy go for 8-12 reps, and anything above that is muscular endurance and won't improve your strength per se. As a result of this, my training before I started GB involved doing 5x5 sets of pull-ups, chin-ups etc, advancing to the next progression (close grip pull-ups, uneven pull-ups etc) when I could achieve that standard.
So I was interested to find out that in the GB course a lot of the progressions involve achieving 5 sets of 15 reps, which, relative to the training I have been doing prior, seems like a ridiculously high amount of reps, more in line with crossfit than conventional strength training.
Pavel Tsatsouline says that "performing more than six reps per set hinders strength development", and that is the philosophy I have followed thus far. So I am wondering, if working towards strength standards such as the Straddle Planche and Rope Climbs, why does the GB method involves high rep training?
I am open to this method but if someone could point me towards an article or explanation as to why this approach is advantageous over a low rep strength training based approach I would be very appreciative. It would be nice to understand more about the philosophy behind this approach to training.
Thanks.