Hi coach(es) / other members,
I suspect I already know the answer, but if I am doing, say, FL PE1/Step 1 and I easily complete it, the answer is NOT to go to FL PE2/Step 1, is it? Rather I should go for PE1/Step 2, isn't that correct? Or in fact, I should test for mastery of FL PE1, and if I fail, regress back to the appropriate level, and if I pass, progress onto FL PE2? I just twigged this today when the reps for MN PE1/Step 5 jumped up to 9 per set. Also, because I could easily manage RC PE1/Step 1, I went onto RC PE2/Step 1 and I found this easy too and went onto RC3.
So, I would appreciate it if someone would confirm that you must have mastery of an exercise, before moving onto PE/MN/RC 2 etc? Seems obvious now, but I was jumping up exercises.
Also, as a rule, should you test for mastery at the start of every new exercise?
More generally, I'm making progress in FL, SL, HBP and RC, but my swivel hips for sPL PE1 is going to take months to resolve, with pointers from this forum, and WOD and mainly Dean Somerset's take on side planks. My MN is okay-ish, the windmills are tough enough, and my SLS is going to take time too, I can't squat fully down without tipping back, and I need momentum to get back up if I don't have a higher stack of mats behind me. This is tight achilles and calf, I deduce, from the instructional videos (and hey, who knows, one day I might be able to do a correct crab/ape).
As with fundamentals though, my shoulders have continued to open up incredibly.