I'm working on tuck planche form at the minute and I am aware that I should not arch my back, protract and depress to the maximum, hips at shoulder height maximise my lean. When I look at some of the later progressions in the course though, the hips are slightly higher: at head height.
This applies to PL/SE4 and 5/6 when extending the legs into straddle. I am just wondering what the benefit of me trying to keep my hips at shoulder height is in tuck planche when in open planche the hips are raised?
I find that arching the back allows the hips to be raised higher and I now know this is incorrect and instead one must lean into it maintaining a rounder back however when I look at straddle the back looks arched slightly to me?
The protraction in the videos doesn't look like 100% maximum either which is what I am trying to achieve at the moment, stopping the set when I feel the slightest decrease.
I wonder if I am focusing too much on form when instead I should aim to just get my hold times up and improve form afterwards? Or is there little point in training with say for example protraction that is slightly less maximised than at the start of the set.
Is this what 'form follows function' means?
Should I count sets of planche work that are less than 100% protracted, depressed, hips at shoulder height, etc? Will I still see a carry over to 100% protracted/depressed work or is it a fruitless endeavour like trying to train bent arm planche for straight arm carry over?
Thanks
David