Why the different number of progressions?

In F2, some exercises like FL, RC and HBP have eight progressions, while others, e.g. sPL have only four.

Why is this - Is it because the sPL progressions take longer to complete?

Just curious, looks like a great product, as usual.  B)

I think it's based on the 'strength chart' levels. The 1.5, 2.0 etc are the benchmarks, and there's only so much they can be broken down in between those markers.

Different elements tend to develop at different paces. There's still plenty of material to come.

Also note that the exercises divide into logical groups.

It will be even more clear as the series progresses.

Cory Fair said:

Different elements tend to develop at different paces. There's still plenty of material to come.

...and planche in particular develops slowly, I get it.

Ravn said:

...and planche in particular develops slowly, I get it.

Ironically it took less total time of training for me to achieve a planche than a FL despite the balance and more skill needed for the former.