Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

V-sit question


Flavio85
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, I've been working on my V-sit lately focusing on locking the elbow, here's a picture:

 

I'm trying to understand why is it so hard on the triceps (at least at first), is it because the long head of the triceps not only extends the elbow but also acts as a shoulder extensors?

 

Is it right that this is rated with an A in the gymnastic code point? I can't find a list with the ratings of this skills.. 

post-8642-0-11448200-1405281390_thumb.jp

Edited by Flavio85
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, that's true the long head of the triceps also acts as a shoulder extensor as well as adductor too.

 

Your V-sit is not bad. I think it's right rated at an A since it is still very easy, but some V-sits with the hips pushed out very far almost to Manna is pretty hard though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Christoph Pahl

I've always seen it as B. I think it's hard for your triceps simply because you have to extend your arms: Your arms would prefer to bend. Imagine an axis through your elbows, everything fixed in the V-sit position but no active arm extension: You would rotate forwards, your butt into the ground.

 

Unfortunately I have no good idea where your centre of mass is in the photo, so I can only give an extremely crude estimate: If the projection of your centre of mass onto your arm is half the length of your forearm away from you elbow, and there are only angles of 45° or 90° involved, each arm does a ~ 1/6*bodyweight  triceps extension. These I find hard.

Edited by Christoph
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always seen it as B. I think it's hard for your triceps simply because you have to extend your arms: Your arms would prefer to bend. Imagine an axis through your elbows, everything fixed in the V-sit position but no active arm extension: You would rotate forwards, your butt into the ground.

 

Unfortunately I have no good idea where your centre of mass is in the photo, so I can only give an extremely crude estimate: If the projection of your centre of mass onto your arm is half the length of your forearm away from you elbow, and there are only angles of 45° or 90° involved, each arm does a ~ 1/6*bodyweight  triceps extension. These I find hard.

So it would be something like in the image. The triceps will extend the elbow moving the body as a whole upwards from one hinge (elbow joint) with the center of mass in front of that fulcrum.

post-8642-0-33480800-1405416217_thumb.jp

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Christoph Pahl

That's a good illustration. The triceps prevent you to land in the position of the left hand side (in fact, the hip flexors also gave in a little bit there).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my (severely limited) experience, rotating your palms (so that the fingers face backwards) makes the elbow locking feel more intuitive. Not easier, necessarily, just a little bit more natural. And although v-sits don't seem to be the right way to progress to a manna, I feel doing them this way will help when you start moving towards manna progressions. It will still be hard on your triceps, and much harder on your wrists, so don't do it this way unless your wrists are adequately prepared. I have also seen a lot of people do them on the knuckles, like the lady is doing, to the right of the forum page. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my (severely limited) experience, rotating your palms (so that the fingers face backwards) makes the elbow locking feel more intuitive. Not easier, necessarily, just a little bit more natural. And although v-sits don't seem to be the right way to progress to a manna, I feel doing them this way will help when you start moving towards manna progressions. It will still be hard on your triceps, and much harder on your wrists, so don't do it this way unless your wrists are adequately prepared. I have also seen a lot of people do them on the knuckles, like the lady is doing, to the right of the forum page. 

with palms backwards I find it quite harder. I think she's doing it on her knukles because she's not depressing enough the shoulders, and her butt would touch the ground :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with palms backwards I find it quite harder. I think she's doing it on her knukles because she's not depressing enough the shoulders, and her butt would touch the ground :)

By palms backwards, I assume you  mean fingers facing backwards? If so, yes, this is much harder on the bicep tendon if you're new to that hand placement. But getting used to it would be beneficial, because if you ever choose to work towards a manna, it might be nice to have some amount of strength in that fingers backward position.  You might be onto something with the lack of shoulder depression. But have seen lots of gymnasts do it that way on their floor routines. No idea why.

 

My basic idea behind trying to incorporate that position is that it is recommended with everything. Ring support: rings turned out. Ring handstands: rings turned out. Ring planche: Most gymnasts do it with the palms forward. All these positions have one thing in common: We are striving to get the thumb on the outside rather than the inside (sorry, can't think of a technical way to describe this). Not to say that being able to hold static positions like this on the floor would directly help anything on rings, but I'd like to think there is some carryover. Not an expert, just my gut. :)

Edited by SM3091
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

By palms backwards, I assume you  mean fingers facing backwards? If so, yes, this is much harder on the bicep tendon if you're new to that hand placement. But getting used to it would be beneficial, because if you ever choose to work towards a manna, it might be nice to have some amount of strength in that fingers backward position.  You might be onto something with the lack of shoulder depression. But have seen lots of gymnasts do it that way on their floor routines. No idea why.

 

My basic idea behind trying to incorporate that position is that it is recommended with everything. Ring support: rings turned out. Ring handstands: rings turned out. Ring planche: Most gymnasts do it with the palms forward. All these positions have one thing in common: We are striving to get the thumb on the outside rather than the inside (sorry, can't think of a technical way to describe this). Not to say that being able to hold static positions like this on the floor would directly help anything on rings, but I'd like to think there is some carryover. Not an expert, just my gut. :)

I started to train it with fingers facing backwards, with some consistency I hope I'll get it. The thumb on the outside requires shoulder external rotation (probably more infraspinatus involvement). Do you feel it different on your triceps?

Edited by Flavio85
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I started to train it with fingers facing backwards, with some consistency I hope I'll get it. The thumb on the outside requires shoulder external rotation (probably more infraspinatus involvement). Do you feel it different on your triceps?

Shoulder external rotation, yes. But the majority of the strain is felt in the biceps tendon. I feel more intense contraction (and cramping) in the triceps. I don't think this is a direct consequence of teh palm placement. Rather, that position, enables a better lockout for me (now that I don't feel the strain in the bicep tendon anymore) and this leads to a stronger contraction of the triceps. It might be worth mentioning that my elbows significatly hyperextend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By palms backwards, I assume you  mean fingers facing backwards? If so, yes, this is much harder on the bicep tendon if you're new to that hand placement. But getting used to it would be beneficial, because if you ever choose to work towards a manna, it might be nice to have some amount of strength in that fingers backward position.  You might be onto something with the lack of shoulder depression. But have seen lots of gymnasts do it that way on their floor routines. No idea why.

 

My basic idea behind trying to incorporate that position is that it is recommended with everything. Ring support: rings turned out. Ring handstands: rings turned out. Ring planche: Most gymnasts do it with the palms forward. All these positions have one thing in common: We are striving to get the thumb on the outside rather than the inside (sorry, can't think of a technical way to describe this). Not to say that being able to hold static positions like this on the floor would directly help anything on rings, but I'd like to think there is some carryover. Not an expert, just my gut. :)

Hands backwards for the manna and V-sit does not put more stress on the biceps since you are pushing in the opposite direction of where the biceps are facing. It is not like hands back planche.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hands backwards for the manna and V-sit does not put more stress on the biceps since you are pushing in the opposite direction of where the biceps are facing. It is not like hands back planche.

Good point. Like I said, it was a gut feeling. I do think that a certain degree of bicep tendon (again, not the bicep, the bicep tendon) conditioning is required to hold those positions. Even with support holds on rings, I remember I had sharp pain along my tendons when I first started out, even though my shoulders were not ahead of my wrists. Locking elbows out is not an intuitive movement for any other sport, and for an absolute beginner like myself, V-sit and manna progressions do affect the bicep tendon. 

 

Not challenging your expertise though. Your input is appreciated. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For sure, RTO supports and RTO L-sits stress the biceps tendons since they are still protecting the elbows from being over-extended despite no forward lean. V-sits and mannas on the other hand have a slight lean backwards where the triceps are working hard to keep the elbows locked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For sure, RTO supports and RTO L-sits stress the biceps tendons since they are still protecting the elbows from being over-extended despite no forward lean. V-sits and mannas on the other hand have a slight lean backwards where the triceps are working hard to keep the elbows locked and the force vectors no longer try to over-extend the elbows.

That's interesting. For some reason though, I find that my elbows always have a tendency to overextend when doing any kind of V-sit progressions. I do have quite a bit of hyperextension present in my elbows, so  I think once the elbows go beyond 180 degrees, my body weight is acting to emphasize the extension. I can't explain it, but if you look at the image to the right, you can kind of see how the weight is pushing the elbows in to extension. Or maybe I'm just doing something way off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know about your case, but when I first tried to do V-sits I had to fight a little to keep my arms locked since they want to bend and I have quite a bit of hyperextension in my elbows too. I feel like the triceps and not the shoulder extension are the ones keeping the elbows locked in a V-sit/manna whereas they do not need to fight to keep the arms locked in a planche since your shoulders are pushing forward. Triceps extension only comes to play in a planche when doing push-ups whereas your triceps are statically extending in a V-sit/manna. I could be wrong though, but this is my theory and from what I feel is happening when doing them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David McManamon

10546546_272825862904612_486383694_n.jpg

 

I have attached an image of me attempting a v-sit, the work required of your triceps will depend a lot on how far forward you are pushing your hips and your forward fold.  Since this balance move requires both strength and flexibility remember to work both.  A lot of overhead or front lever type straight arm strength moves send the stress directly into your shoulders or lats but this type of move is a great way to get in some tricep work.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coach Sommer

Hands backwards for the manna and V-sit does not put more stress on the biceps since you are pushing in the opposite direction of where the biceps are facing. It is not like hands back planche.

Actually beginners, with their relatively tight and weak biceps, tend to feel enormous stretch in the elbow with fingers back and the hips elevated.

Yours in Fitness,

Coach Sommer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coach Sommer

Thanks for clearing things up Coach.

No problem. The extreme tightness of their elbows surprised me as well when I first began working with adult beginners.

Yours in Fitness,

Coach Sommer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Daniel Burnham

No problem. The extreme tightness of their elbows surprised me as well when I first began working with adult beginners.

Yours in Fitness,

Coach Sommer

I also noticed this. I found that active release therapy helped this quite a bit on people who were willing to get it done. I'm sure other massage methods would also help quite a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Farid Mirkhani

I had tightness around that area aswell. What worked for me was standing next to a wall, so that your oblique is facing the wall. Raise your arm to a 90 degree fashion, place your hands on the wall with fingers facing downwards. If your very tight, this will be brutal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please review our Privacy Policy at Privacy Policy before using the forums.